Text des Beschlusses

T-87/06;

Rechtskräftig: unbekannt!

Beschluss - Kurz

In Case T-87/06,

L’Oréal S.A., established in Paris (France), represented by X. Buffet Delmas d’Autane, lawyer,

applicant,

v

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent,

defendant,

the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being

Revlon (Suisse) S.A., established in Schlieren (Switzerland),

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 January 2006 (Case R 216/2003-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Revlon (Suisse) S.A. and L’Oréal S.A.,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER
OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

makes the following

Order

1 By letter lodged at the Court Registry on 7 July 2006, the applicant informed the Court of First Instance, in accordance with Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, that it wishes to discontinue the proceedings and that each party bear its own costs.

2 By letter lodged at the Court Registry on 30 August 2006, the defendant indicated to the Court of First Instance that it had no objections to raise concerning the discontinuance of the proceedings and requested that in accordance with Article 87(5) of the Rules of Procedure the applicant be ordered to bear the costs.

3 Article 87(5), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure provides that a party who discontinues or withdraws from proceedings be ordered to bear the costs if they have been applied for in the observations of the other party on the discontinuance.

4 In the present case the defendant requested that the applicant be ordered to bear the costs. It is therefore appropriate to order that the applicant bear the costs.

On those grounds,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER

hereby orders:

1. Case T-87/06 is removed from the register of the Court of First Instance.

2. The applicant shall bear the costs.

Luxembourg, 11 October 2006.

E. Coulon


J. Pirrung

Registrar

President

-----------------------------------------------------
Die von uns erfassten Urteile wurden oft anders formatiert als das Original. Dies bedeutet, daß Absätze eingefügt und Hervorhebungen durch fett-/kursiv-/&farbig-machen sowie Unterstreichungen vorgenommen wurden. Dies soll verdeutlichen, aber keinesfalls natürlich den Sinn verändern.Wenn Sie vorsichtshalber zusätzlich die Originalversion sehen möchten, hier ist der Link zur QuelleLink zur Quelle (kein Link? Dann ist dieser Link nicht in unserer DB gespeichert, z.B. weil das Urteil vor Frühjahr 2009 gespeichert worden ist).